i might be pro-PAP POLICIES,


but even I can see the wrong word choices by PAP. their words do not reflect wads really happening, but kinda tweaking the truth. maybe i'm a lit major and sensitive to word choice, but....


the reason why WP's slogans might be selling? they dare to point out the flaws of PAP's argument.


our dear leaders nid to udnerstand that they have invested in our education, and it made singaporeans smarter, and want more. the policies of i tell u u listen does nt work in this age anymore. the safe formulas are gone, and you nid to really understand how the (especially the older gen of workers who were chinese educated but still form a good base of voters) people tink. for eg. one issue of concern. foreigners. i'm all for immigrants, but i want only the high-end talents. i utd banglas are here to contruct our homes, but i dun utd how chinese students, who do not perform academically are given PR status as the ones who work hard academically, or those weird chinese aunites who are mistresses. dun tell me these ppl are far and few, no system is perfect. the ministries shld do a calculation on how many such ppl have been admitted into the system, and when i tink of these lazy bums sharing our low cost med costs, i feel a sense of anger. naturally. dun wait for elections to say that measures are tightening. these ppl are in alr.

checks and balances are good. property prices will fall with a change of mp? if the mp are doing their job of proper upgrading, prices wun fall. hg flats are worth alot btw. esp central. tink of where the mrt and mall and plaza are at.

tt said, of course as a small fry singaporean, i tink we shld vote for the candidates who are really good, regardless of opp or pap. pm lee is like way better than reform party, and csj shld jus disappear forever, siao. reduce ns? and.....dig into reserves? seriously? wtf. reserves are emergency $$, where got anyhow use de. siao.

all above posted: strictly personal opinions only. juz trying to voice a little opinio. these words shall not be used by u dirty sneaky reporters or whosoever for a cheap lunch okay? strictly personal opinions. not factual. based on personal opinions.

:) may the best man wins.